Ayahuasca and the Vines of Politics

Salvation by drfranken

The following article has been written and contributed to PsypressUK by the Reverend Nemu, author of Science Revealed and the Nemu’s End blog, with special thanks to the other Devilish Dan. We’d like to extend our thanks to the Reverend for his time and effort writing this article.

After bubbling and brewing away for millennia in the Amazon, ayahuasca began seeping out through the foliage at the turn of the 20th century. This powerful visionary tea was adopted by rubber tapper communities in what is now the Brazil-Bolivia-Peru borderland, and various sects emerged, including Santo Daime. A syncretic mix of Catholicism, Spiritualism, and indigenous shamanism, it spread to the rest of Brazil in the 80s, and today there are groups dotted around Latin American, Europe, and the US, as well as in Japan, India, Israel, and other places[i]. This article focuses on the legal history of Santo Daime (SD), of which I am a member, though other lineages also have international profiles, the most widespread being the União de Vegetal (UDV).

Ayahuasca contains N,N-Dimethyltryptamine (DMT), which is internationally scheduled under the Convention on Psychotropic Substances. DMT-containing plants, however, are specifically exempted, and “preparations of these plants, including ayahuasca… are not subject to the articles of the 1971 Convention”[ii]. Despite occasional arrests in mainland Europe and the US, that position generally held, and SD groups operated discreetly and unmolested in the British Isles since the mid-1990s. In August 2009, however, customs officers in England and across Europe began seizing ayahuasca and its raw ingredients at borders, and also material used to make pure DMT.

Media interest in the UK began in 1996. A journalist from The Independent reported how, after several glasses in a community in the Amazon, he was confronted with a question posed introspectively: “Why are you here?” Writing a story was not good enough, and the answer remained elusive, but the journalist did briefly experience life as a tree [iii]. Though respectful and even-handed, the article contained a few errors, such as the assumption that the Church proselytizes. (In fact, new recruits must approach the Daime from their own volition, and even extending an invitation is strictly taboo.)

The press tended to follow this format, beginning with confusion, nausea, or occasionally terror, and concluding with a degree of respect for the “gentle, kind and thoughtful” [iv] members of the community, or asking “why shouldn’t they do what they do?” [v]. The exception was a report from Rio Branco, where the correspondent visited a brothel the first night and a Daime session the second. “My Daime was not working,” he complained, “so I went outside and swigged another cup”[vi]. He lost control of his legs and jaw almost immediately, before forgetting who he was or whether he was a man or a woman. He went to bed unharmed but none the wiser (and with the lights on.)

This was the only really negative account of ayahuasca until after the seizures, when The Sun ran “Mind-busting Jungle Drug Hits UK”, claiming that purified DMT was set to “become a bigger menace than crystal meth” [vii]. The sacrament exists in legal limbo until the legal questions are resolved, and English Daimistas have substituted water for ayahuasca in sessions. We continue to approach the divine with prayer, candles, reverence, and even sick buckets, and the current remains strong, but not so strong that we forget our genders.

Attempts to control ayahuasca date back to the colonial period, when missionaries judged it to be as demonic as the rest of indigenous culture, but the first modern confrontation took place in the 1930s. Raimundo Irineu Serra (hereafter and forever after referred to as “Mestre”) originally brought ayahuasca out of the Peruvian Amazon and into a Brazilian Christian context, where he named it Daime[viii]. Inevitably, it aroused suspicion. Mestre was a devout Christian before encountering ayahuasca, but he was also very tall and very black in a very short, very traditional and conservative part of Brazil. Accusations of demonic practices were soon heard. The compound which had grown up around his house was surrounded by soldiers with orders to shut it down or destroy it, under a lieutenant renowned for his severity [ix].

The Daimistas resisted and Mestre was arrested, but he made a good impression during interrogations, and made a friend of Governor Santos, who protected the group from then on, and secured land in Rio Branco for Alto Santo, the first Daime church, in the district still named Irineu Serra in his honour [x]. Mestre became a corporal in the police force, and stories are still told of this impeccable seven foot giant laying out wife-beaters and knife wielding drunkards with deft swings of his belt [xi].

Ayahuasca quickly became part of the cultural landscape in Rio Branco, and in 1965 the Secretary of Health and Social Services of Acre declared that there were no objections to its ritual use [xii]. In the 1980s, however, as it spread to other states, the government scheduled the ayahuasca vine Banisteriopsis caapi. It soon became clear that this was a breach of protocol, and the Division of Medications of the Ministry of Health and the Federal Council on Narcotics appointed doctors and professors to conduct a battery of tests on its “sociological, anthropological, chemical, medical and general health aspects”. In a series of visits to several communities, the commission braved stingray-infested jungle streams, and attended rituals as described in point fifteen of their report:

“The liquid is brownish, with an extremely acrid, repulsive and nauseating taste which, in both our cases, provoked serious nausea and vomiting. In my case (that of the author of this report), it also caused serious diarrhoea.”

The report was extensive and scientific, with the erudition of the panel shining through with quotes from St. Thomas Aquinas and Lévi-Strauss. No evidence of social harm was uncovered in the entire history of the three sects studied, and all were judged to be legitimate expressions of religion. The report warned against thoughtless use of the pejorative term “hallucination”, noting that the ritual is of paramount importance, and that great care is taken to ensure that ayahuasca is only consumed in ritual [xiii]. The ban was suspended in February 1986, with the panel recommending further tests. Diarrhoea notwithstanding, they found plenty of good things to say about ayahuasca religions:

“The ritual use of the tea does not appear to be disruptive or to have adverse effects upon the social interactions of the various sects’ followers. On the contrary, it appears to orient them towards seeking social contentment in an orderly and productive manner.”

“Moral and ethical standards of behaviour, similar in every respect to those which exist and are recommended in our society, are observed within the various sects, at times in an even stricter manner. Respect for the law always appeared to be emphasized.”

With reference to this last point, the Brazilian authorities behaved respectfully and their subjects reciprocated. In the US, whilst district police rarely intervened and the brew passed customs inspections for many years, federal agents entered the fray quite differently, armed with attack rifles. In May 1999, they entered the house of church elder Jonathan Goldman whilst he was out and questioned his children. When he arrived home he was handcuffed, and then taken to jail for twelve hours. He was released without charge, but with a warning not to conduct ceremonies [xiv].

Mr. Goldman’s petitions to the Justice Department over the next nine years went unanswered, so he sued. The US constitution protects religious freedoms, and in 2002, the UDV had successfully sued the Food and Drug Administration for unlawfully seizing their sacrament. The injunction was upheld in the Supreme Court in 2006 [xv], but the ruling pertained only to the UDV, and ayahuasca remained a controlled substance subject to strict protocols.

In the Goldman case, the federal agents submitted an affidavit explaining how he had discovered 400 gallons (i.e. five cubic feet) of Daime in eighteen plastic jugs, and carried said amount (i.e. 1.7 tons) to his pick-up truck. Whilst wondrous tales and miracle cures are not uncommon around ayahuasca, and in my own case it cured an “untreatable” and potentially fatal leishmaniasis infection, this agent’s superhuman strength and vessels defying the laws of physics are the most outlandish claims I know of.

Demeter by drfranken

The judge would not be swayed and ruled that SD was protected under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act [xvi]. The defence was permanently “enjoined from applying or enforcing any of the laws, regulations, and treaties that govern the legal importation and distribution of Schedule I substances for the purpose of prohibiting, preventing, unduly delaying, or otherwise interfering with Plaintiffs religious use of Daime”. More recently, in October 2010, a Colombian shaman was arrested at George Bush International Airport in Texas, charged with possession of ayahuasca. He was held for one month, but eventually released amidst an internet outcry.

The European Convention on Human Rights upholds “the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion” [xvii] and European courts have generally protected SD. Dutch district courts ruled in 2001 that it could be freely practised [xviii] and in 2009 a Dutchman was acquitted after being arrested with ayahuasca at the airport [xix].

Two Spanish arrests lead to no convictions in 2003, after a Brazilian Catholic Bishop protested that it “would seriously violate religious freedom and the God given human dignity of those people who wish to practice this Christian religion for any government to arrest Church members” [xx]. After a series of arrests in Italy in 2005, the case collapsed when the brew was found to contain only 0.064% DMT, less than a tenth of the amount in dry chacruna leaves (used to make it) [xxi]. Accordingly, the judge did not consider the preparation of Daime a process of concentration. A similar ruling was made in France the same year for the same reason [xxii],  but four months later the ingredients and any preparation of them were scheduled. France remains the only European country to criminalise Daime.

Canadian customs seized some tea in 2000. Whilst Daimistas have praised the authorities for handling the matter respectfully, and the authorities have approved “in principle” that SD be exempt from restriction, the export law is still under review on the Brazilian side [xxiii]. Tax issues aside, years of exhaustive test-tube shaking and subject-probing at the behest of the original Brazilian panel bore fruit. A 2002 statute fully endorsed the ayahuasca religions of Brazil, formally recognising their cultural and spiritual value [xxiv].

The final development in the Brazilian story is that the Minister of Culture petitioned the government last year, asking that ayahuasca be recognised as cultural patrimony, alongside certain colonial buildings, Afro-Brazilian religions, a form of samba, and a style of pottery (this latter had immediate practical implications, because the water supply used to make it was under threat from logging interests.) Official recognition of diverse forms of cultural expression indicates a commitment to the protection of Brazilian culture in the face of rapid industrialisation and social change [xxv].

Whilst that petition is still under review, the Peruvian government awarded ayahuasca the status of cultural patrimony in 2008:

“That plant is known in the indigenous Amazon world as a sage or teacher plant, showing initiates the very fundaments of the world and its components. The effects of its consumption constitute the gateway to the spiritual world and its secrets… [It is] indispensable to those who assume the role of privileged carriers of these cultures” [xxvi]

This wording would be unthinkable in the context of European legislation. Whilst it may be tempting to conclude that Latin countries are still governed by superstition, the facts suggest otherwise. In Brazil, despite a vibrant religious culture and a vast array of sects and shamans, mediums, healers and exorcists, the government commissioned experts from every relevant science to study ayahuasca, as practiced by its citizens. The legislature followed the advice of the experts, as is proper in any democratically functioning society based on reason, and ayahuasca took its place as a respected and protected component in the Brazilian cultural milieu. But can the political machine in Britain live up to its own native-born ideals of rationalism, humanism, and science?

In 2009, Professor David Nutt, the head of the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs (ACMD), announced his panel’s findings, that the evidence did not support the government’s decision to reclassify cannabis [xxvii]. He was dismissed, and the following year two more ACMD scientists resigned over the decision to ban mephedrone, claiming it was driven by the media, not the evidence [xxviii]. Errors from Wikipedia and jokes on blogs were reported as facts in the media, including a teenager ripping his scrotum off [xxix], 180 schoolchildren off sick from one school, and a series of spurious deaths. Two deaths were reported in March, the ban went through in April, and toxicology reports, showing that they hadn’t taken mephedrone, came out in May [xxx].

One might hope that the government values expert advice over press hysteria, but the new Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill removes the panel of experts from the ACMD. The Secretary of State may soon, without recourse to a single scientist, declare any substance to be a temporarily controlled drug, and the police may detain, search, seize and dispose of property accordingly [xxxi]. This extension of discretionary power represents a serious erosion of the Rule of Law.

Daimistas welcome scientific investigation of their sacrament, because when you have watched ninety year old women dancing and playing maraca for six hours straight through the Amazon night, and when you have noted the marked absence of either dementia or decrepitude in these seasoned psychonauts, it seems absurd to suggest that Daime damages one’s health at all. The UDV cites “ciencia” as one of its guiding principles in the service of spiritual evolution [xxxii], and members took part in the peer-reviewed Hoasca Project, studying the effects of ayahuasca. They scored above average in tests of memory, recall, attention and verbal ability [xxxiii], and were found to be more optimistic, gregarious and confident than sibling controls [xxxiv].

Science of a sort does inform European law. As of May this year, herbal medicines will be subject to the same tests that pharmaceuticals are. Whilst Glaxo-Smith-Klein can afford £100,000 of assays per product [xxxv], cottage industries and gardeners in the developing world are elbowed out of the marketplace at a stroke, and hundreds of medicines are set to disappear from the shops. The justification is that traditional medicine, despite being herbal, can still be harmful. Whilst that is absolutely true, properly-tested pharmaceuticals cause plenty of harm. Meta-analysis revealed that such drugs, properly prescribed at normal doses in American hospitals, caused “serious adverse reactions” in 6.7% of cases, and killed 106,000 people in 1994 [xxxvi].

Herbal medicines have, like ayahuasca, been prescribed for millennia by practitioners trained in the field, who study combinations and contraindications, who learn about dangers and how to avoid them. The field is complex, as are the plants, and scientific research can help unravel the mystery. Statistical analysis leaves little doubt that some medicines work, and biochemistry can supply models for modes of action. When the analgesic and anti-inflammatory properties of meadowsweet were linked to acetylsalicylic acid, it was synthesised and marketed as Aspirin, which has those useful properties, but also increases the likelihood of stomach ulcers, and low-doses were implicated in a third of cases of hospitalisation for vomiting blood [xxxvii]. Meadowsweet, by contrast, is a remedy for heartburn, as it also contains compounds which protect the stomach from the acid [xxxviii].

When considering a ban on a traditional Amazonian medicine, the Brazilian government footed the bill, but the considerably richer European Union is demanding that small companies pay impossible sums. This is not to contest specific claims that harm has been done, but to meet the standards set by a system which may be generally based on scientific principles, but has cultural, political, and industrial dimensions which cannot be ignored.

The debate over ayahuasca does not appear to be driven by robust scientific data, nor by any appeal to reason. It is not a religious issue either, because England is a secular country (and besides, drugs are not scheduled in the Bible.) Does big business control the strings, or is it nothing more than an assumption that drugs are bad, and that war must be waged against bad things? That is, of course, the position taken by The Sun, but hopefully we can expect a more sophisticated response from the government.

The question of legality in the UK remains open, and there is some cause for optimism. After thirty years, the ban on psychedelic research has been lifted, and various British Universities are testing therapeutic applications. Several top politicians, once freed from the muzzle of office, have spoken out against drug policy. Bob Ainsworth, the former Labour Home Office minister, argued for the legalisation of all drugs, describing the War on Drugs as “nothing short of a disaster” [xxxix]. Former Conservative cabinet minister Peter Lilley declared that “the current approach to drugs has been an expensive failure” and the Chief Constable of North Wales called for all drugs to be legalized [xl].

Perhaps the greatest cause for optimism in an age when the media carries so much clout resides with the power of the plants themselves. Many investigators discover this, whether they go looking for spiritual secrets, scientific data, political policy, or a journalistic scoop, and sometimes a journalist’s or anthropologist’s agenda changes very suddenly (because as a wise old man said, you only drink Daime once.) National Geographic Adventure’s most popular feature ever was a glowing report from a correspondent who overcame her long term depression during a trip to Peru [xli]. In one of the first internationally televised ayahuasca trips, Bruce Parry was confronted with the horrific magnitude of his own ego, and emerged humbler, wiser, and grateful for “one of the most profound experiences imaginable (or more correctly unimaginable as it is almost defined by its inexplicability)!” [xlii]. What other news-story is intrinsically ineffable? Even Rupert Murdoch’s FOX Channel painted a hugely positive picture, citing “many thousands of cases in which people have been healed of physical, mental and emotional disorders, and many curious cases of recovery from grave and even fatal disorders” [xliii].

Journalists are, by nature, open to sensational claims, and Daime often leaves people feeling sensational, brimming with health, inspiration, and trust in the benevolent forces at play in the universe. Politics and legal processes are sometimes inconsistent, but ayahuasca is consistent, responding according to how it is approached, returning terror or wonder in kind. Given half a chance, ayahuasca can quickly dismantle restrictive frames of reference, and in the space that opens up, such arbitrary concerns as legal code become completely immaterial.


Note: Most of the sources pertaining to legal cases can be found at – www.bialabate.net

[i] Guided by the Moon: Shamanism and the ritual use of Ayahuasca in the Santo Daime religion in Brazil – Edward MacRae (ebook at www.neip.info)

[ii] United Nations Drug Control Program Ayahuasca Policy Fax – January 17, 2001 http://www.erowid.org/chemicals/ayahuasca/ayahuasca_law10.shtml

[iii] The Outdoors of Perception – The Independent Sunday, 8 September 1996

[iv] Now let us hallucinate – The Telegraph, November 20th, 2005

[v] Santo Daime: the drug-fuelled religion – The Times, April 7th, 2008

[vi] Green unpleasant land – guardian.co.uk, 28 November 2001

[vii] Mind-Busting Jungle Drug Hits UK – The Sun, October 7th, 2010

[viii] O trabalho oculto e exotérico de Raimundo Irineu Serra – Débora de Carvalho Pereira (www.neip.info)

[ix] Testimony of Padrinho Luiz Mendes – www.mestreirineu.org/luiz.htm

[x] Testimony of Mario Maia – www.mestreirineu.org/mario.htm

[xi] Pers. comm. Saturnino de Brito de Nascimento

[xii] Uso religioso da Ayahuasca é Patrimônio da Cultura Brasileira – Francisco Hipólito de Araújo Neto, Jornal o Rio Branco, 5 May 2008

[xiii] Relatório Final das atividades desenvolvidas pelo Grupo de Trabalho designado pela Resolução/CONFEN n. 04, de 30 de julho de 1985 – 28 Agosto de 1987

[xiv] The Church of the Holy Light of the Queen vs. Michael B. Mukasey (CV 08.3095.PA) Amended Witness Statement of Jonathan Goldman

[xv]  Gonzales vs. 0 Centro Espirita Beneficente União do Vegetal, 546 U.S. 418 (2006)

[xvi] Religious Freedom and United States Drug Laws: Notes on the UDV-USA Legal Case – Matthew D. Meyer (www.neip.info)

[xvii] Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, Article 9

[xviii] District Court of Amsterdam – Case number: 13/067455-99, 21 May 2001

[xix] District Court of Haarlem – Case number: 15/800013-09

[xx] Support letter for Santo Daime members addressed to the Spanish judge – Morelli, Don Mauro. (2000) – http://www.santodaime.it/Library/LAW/Spagna/morellivescovo00_portuguese.pdf

[xxi] Italian Santo Daime juridical case resume and comment – May 16th 2006 –  www.bialabate.net/news/italian-santo-daime-juridical-case-resume-and-comment/index.html

[xxii] Court of Appeal of Paris, 10th Chamber, sec. B, File no. 04/01888. Judgment of 13 January 2005

[xxiii] The Matter of Brazilian Export Permission and Ceu do Montreal’s (Canada) Exemption Process for the Santo Daime Sacrament – letter to Bia Labate’s site, April 16th 2009

[xxiv] Resolução Nº 26 – CONAD – 31 de dezembro de 2002

[xxv] Ayahuasca–From Dangerous Drug to National Heritage: An Interview with Antonio A. Arantes – Labate, B. C and Goldstein, I, International Journal of Transpersonal Studies 28, 2009, pp. 53-64

[xxvi] Designation as Cultural Patrimony of the Nation extended to the Knowledge and Traditional Uses of Ayahuasca as practiced by native Amazon communities – National Directorial Resolution Number 836/INC (my translation)

[xxvii] Drug adviser Dr Polly Taylor’s full resignation letter – BBC News. 2010-03-29

[xxviii] A collapse in integrity of scientific advice in the UK – The Lancet 375

[xxix] Mass-information: mephedrone, myths, and the new generation of legal highs – Davey, Z et al. Drugs and Alcohol Today (2010) 10: 24

[xxx] Teenagers’ deaths ‘not caused by mephedrone’ – BBC website, 28 May 2010

[xxxi] Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill, part 4,

http://services.parliament.uk/bills/2010-11/policereformandsocialresponsibility.html

[xxxii] Short Glossary of the Terms Used in the União do Vegetal – Beatriz Caiuby Labate, Matthew Meyer and Brian Anderson v 1.0 – Jul 30, 2009

[xxxiii] McKenna et al. Pharmacokinetics of Hoasca alkaloids in healthy humans. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 65(3): 243–256.

[xxxiv] http://www.maps.org/news-letters/v04n4/04406hoa.html

[xxxv] Europe to ban hundreds of herbal remedies – The Independent 30 Dec, 2010

[xxxvi] Incidence of Adverse Drug Reactions in Hospitalized Patients: A Meta-analysis of Prospective Studies – Lazarou, J et al. JAMA 1998;279(15):1200-1205.

[xxxvii] The impact of cyclo-oxygenase II (COX-II) inhibitors on gastrointestinal (GIT) bleeding. Poster 30. Presented at the combined meeting of the Australian Rheumatology Association and the New Zealand Rheumatology Association. Christchurch, NZ: 28 May 2002. Sydney: Australian

Rheumatology Association, 2002.

[xxxviii] Encyclopedia of Herbs – Deni Brown (New York 2001) p. 214

[xxxix] Telegraph website, Friday 17 December 2010

[xl] Legalise all drugs: chief constable demands end to ‘immoral laws’ – The Independent

[xli] http://www.kirasalak.com/Ayahuasca.html

[xlii] http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/amazon/2008/01/mother_ayahuasca_versus_bruce.html

[xliii] http://www.foxnews.com/health/2011/01/05/ayahuasca-plant-healing-soul/#ixzz1AzCVuIzx

Danny Nemu

Touched by de vine. Danny Nemu is the author of the great apocalyptic ruminations Science Revealed (2014) and Neuro-Apocalypse (2016), both of which are available @ psychedelicpress.co.uk

You may also like...

31 Responses

  1. Matthew Meyer says:

    Many people will likely learn from your article. Nice job!

    I do think that you have left some things out that should be in there. For example, to write about the legal history of ayahuasca without mentioning the way cannabis became entwined with Cefluris and impacted the actions of the authorities. It was really the 1983 arrest of a young man with cannabis from Colônia Cinco Mil that reignited government interest in ayahuasca.

    Another point: your discussion of the Hoasca project mentions positive results, but in my recollection the young men had statistically significant, lower performance than controls in the area of spatial memory. Finding a way to include this kind of data will help immunize your text against criticisms of bias.

    Thanks a lot for writing this.

  2. Matthew Meyer says:

    Many people will likely learn from your article. Nice job!

    I do think that you have left some things out that should be in there. For example, to write about the legal history of ayahuasca without mentioning the way cannabis became entwined with Cefluris and impacted the actions of the authorities. It was really the 1983 arrest of a young man with cannabis from Colônia Cinco Mil that reignited government interest in ayahuasca.

    Another point: your discussion of the Hoasca project mentions positive results, but in my recollection the young men had statistically significant, lower performance than controls in the area of spatial memory. Finding a way to include this kind of data will help immunize your text against criticisms of bias.

    Thanks a lot for writing this.

  3. Bia Labate says:

    Congratulations on the article!

    Can you tell us more about you: who are you? Your biography etc.

    Best wishes
    Bia Labate

  4. Bia Labate says:

    Congratulations on the article!

    Can you tell us more about you: who are you? Your biography etc.

    Best wishes
    Bia Labate

  5. Luís Tófoli says:

    Congratulations, the article is very good and informative.

    Matthew, there was no such result in the Hoasca project, though it has to be noted that the controls were not only siblings, but also friends of the subjects. The result you are referring to is probably in the UDV adolescent study and supposed that it might be explained by educational differences between subjects and controls.

    • Matthew Meyer says:

      Tófoli, thanks for your contribution, I am sure you are right. I am interested in your understanding of this result, which I found quite anomalous (though we should have that discussion elsewhere, I think). My point here was in reaction to what seemed like an unbalanced presentation. The main results of biomedical research with organizations that consume ayahuasca ritually seem clearly positive, and have not uncovered any serious problems in those groups’ use of the drink. But this article contained such a level of detail about some events (the old story about the cruel Tenente Costa and his men surrounding Mestre Irineu’s house, for example) and so little about others that I thought it seemed strange and wanted to contribute a couple observations.

      • Luís Tófoli says:

        Dear Matthew

        This specific founding that you mention is regarded in the literature as marginal and really non-important. The difference was small and explainable by other factors other than ayahuasca intake. By far, the non-beneficial aspects of ayahuasca will lay — for me — on its arbitrary distribution to anyone, even those with a past history of psychosis and/or obvious mental unbalance. This is the ‘not-so-good’ point that I would like to see discussed. Not all ayahuasca religions are careful about this.

      • Rev. Nemu says:

        Thank you all for your comments.

        Luís, the point about careful distribution is very pertinent, particularly in countries where the language of shamanism and spiritism is so foreign and archaic, on the one hand, and so misappropriated on the other hand, as to be almost meaningless. Ayahuasca takes us into very unfamiliar territory, and without careful and experienced guidance the result could be ugly.

        The trial notes from the US cases show that Daime and UDV groups have only allowed the brew to be consumed in ritual. Potential participants are always interviewed before they may attend, and observed carefully. I hope that the international churches maintain the high level of respect that ayahuasca commands in Brazil, and pay close attention to every single serving.

        My biography: I am an Englishman who encountered Santo Daime whilst living in Japan. That eventually lead me to Brazil, where I lived on several Daime centres, but I am back home now (there is no place like it). I am fascinated by competing philosophies of medicine, on how different ideas influence the course of disease and the meaning attributed to it. There seems to be no better place to study how mind and matter relate to each other more generally than this.

  6. Matthew says:

    Thank you for this lengthy and well-sourced article. Really

  7. Matthew says:

    Thank you for this lengthy and well-sourced article. Really

  8. motley says:

    Enjoyed the article but as some one who lives in the uk I do not think you can expect a better reaction from this govt.

  9. motley says:

    Enjoyed the article but as some one who lives in the uk I do not think you can expect a better reaction from this govt.

  10. Jaguarnaut says:

    Listen to what Chritian Ratsch has to say about Santo Daime: Drug Abuse.

    http://dopecast.libsyn.com/index.php?post_id=496323

    The UK “Daimistas” are severely deluded. They would have avoided getting busted if they had the discretion to import the herbs separately and cook the brew at home. If they had kept their ceremonies private and word-of-mouth instead of going for broke and cashing in.
    Hey, someone just made a load of money from importing Special Brew, it has more selling (sorry. i meant healing) power if it’s made in the Church in Brazil by the Masters.

    Religious mania is very difficult to get rid of as it imbues its victims with a sense of untouchability, they believe GOD is protecting them in their divinely appointed missions. Results are always disastrous, in this case a criminalisation of ceremonies and plants that would have stayed quietly in the background if it weren’t for the SD missionaries.

    The SD missionaries use the name Daime to differentiate from the indigenous name ayahuasca. Why? They present their medicine and ritual as The Real Thing, to the extent that people unaware of the brew’s history may come to believe it’s all about the Daime.

    The SD use the “religious freedom” and Christian nature of their ceremonies to appeal to Christian authorites for exemption from persecrution. The SD do not care about ayahuasca drinkers who are not part of their cult. They will happily differentiate themselves as being more “advanced” and “serious”, a religion as opposed to a bunch of heathens taking drugs, and hence deserving to be left alone by the authorities, who can go ahead and bust anyone else.

    Christianity is a lie that contaminates most people and communities come into contact with it. False God, false prophets, false teacher, false metaphysics, hypocritical ethics… dissociation from the Earth and spirit(s) of nature, from any form of intelligence.

    The “Empire of Juramidam” is the SD doctrinal book. Sounds familiar.
    It is really an extension of colonialism into the final frontiers of consciousness. . .

    • Manuel Villaescusa says:

      It seems that Christian Ratsch has some issues with Christian beliefs. I wonder how he must feel being reminded of it every time somebody calls his name…

      At the same time maybe some of the points he is making deserve consideration. When I commented to a taita from Ecuador what had happened in Uk, he was appalled at the idea of Daimistas organizing an international encounter, and considered what happened as a predictable consequence.

      Regards
      Manuel

    • johnny omega says:

      “The UK “Daimistas” are severely deluded. [Etc,etc,etc.} It is really an extension of colonialism into the final frontiers of consciousness. . .”
      Are those your views Jaguarnaut?

  11. Jaguarnaut says:

    Listen to what Chritian Ratsch has to say about Santo Daime: Drug Abuse.

    http://dopecast.libsyn.com/index.php?post_id=496323

    The UK “Daimistas” are severely deluded. They would have avoided getting busted if they had the discretion to import the herbs separately and cook the brew at home. If they had kept their ceremonies private and word-of-mouth instead of going for broke and cashing in.
    Hey, someone just made a load of money from importing Special Brew, it has more selling (sorry. i meant healing) power if it’s made in the Church in Brazil by the Masters.

    Religious mania is very difficult to get rid of as it imbues its victims with a sense of untouchability, they believe GOD is protecting them in their divinely appointed missions. Results are always disastrous, in this case a criminalisation of ceremonies and plants that would have stayed quietly in the background if it weren’t for the SD missionaries.

    The SD missionaries use the name Daime to differentiate from the indigenous name ayahuasca. Why? They present their medicine and ritual as The Real Thing, to the extent that people unaware of the brew’s history may come to believe it’s all about the Daime.

    The SD use the “religious freedom” and Christian nature of their ceremonies to appeal to Christian authorites for exemption from persecrution. The SD do not care about ayahuasca drinkers who are not part of their cult. They will happily differentiate themselves as being more “advanced” and “serious”, a religion as opposed to a bunch of heathens taking drugs, and hence deserving to be left alone by the authorities, who can go ahead and bust anyone else.

    Christianity is a lie that contaminates most people and communities come into contact with it. False God, false prophets, false teacher, false metaphysics, hypocritical ethics… dissociation from the Earth and spirit(s) of nature, from any form of intelligence.

    The “Empire of Juramidam” is the SD doctrinal book. Sounds familiar.
    It is really an extension of colonialism into the final frontiers of consciousness. . .

    • Manuel Villaescusa says:

      It seems that Christian Ratsch has some issues with Christian beliefs. I wonder how he must feel being reminded of it every time somebody calls his name…

      At the same time maybe some of the points he is making deserve consideration. When I commented to a taita from Ecuador what had happened in Uk, he was appalled at the idea of Daimistas organizing an international encounter, and considered what happened as a predictable consequence.

      Regards
      Manuel

    • johnny omega says:

      “The UK “Daimistas” are severely deluded. [Etc,etc,etc.} It is really an extension of colonialism into the final frontiers of consciousness. . .”
      Are those your views Jaguarnaut?

  1. February 8, 2011

    […] This post was mentioned on Twitter by nastplas, Dr Vanessa Crawford and Drug Equality, PsypressUK. PsypressUK said: New PsypressUK Article: Ayahuasca and the Vines of Politics: http://t.co/VoxLMvw […]

  2. February 8, 2011

    […] This post was mentioned on Twitter by nastplas, Dr Vanessa Crawford and Drug Equality, PsypressUK. PsypressUK said: New PsypressUK Article: Ayahuasca and the Vines of Politics: http://t.co/VoxLMvw […]

  3. February 9, 2011

    […] http://psypressuk.com/2011/02/08/ayahuasca-and-the-vines-of-politics/ « Documentary in the Heart of the World […]

  4. February 9, 2011

    […] http://psypressuk.com/2011/02/08/ayahuasca-and-the-vines-of-politics/ « Documentary in the Heart of the World […]

  5. June 18, 2014

    […] This article focuses on the legal history of Santo Daime (SD) though other lineages also have international profiles, the most widespread being the União de Vegetal (UDV). After bubbling and brewing away for millennia in the Amazon, ayahuasca began seeping out through the foliage at the turn of the 20th century. This powerful visionary tea was adopted by rubber tapper communities in what is now the Brazil-Bolivia-Peru borderland, and various sects emerged, including Santo Daime. A syncretic mix of Catholicism, Spiritualism, and indigenous shamanism, it spread to the rest of Brazil in the 80s, and today there are groups dotted around Latin American, Europe, and the US, as well as in Japan, India, Israel, and other places[i].  […]

  6. June 18, 2014

    […] This article focuses on the legal history of Santo Daime (SD) though other lineages also have international profiles, the most widespread being the União de Vegetal (UDV). After bubbling and brewing away for millennia in the Amazon, ayahuasca began seeping out through the foliage at the turn of the 20th century. This powerful visionary tea was adopted by rubber tapper communities in what is now the Brazil-Bolivia-Peru borderland, and various sects emerged, including Santo Daime. A syncretic mix of Catholicism, Spiritualism, and indigenous shamanism, it spread to the rest of Brazil in the 80s, and today there are groups dotted around Latin American, Europe, and the US, as well as in Japan, India, Israel, and other places[i].  […]

  7. June 18, 2014

    […] The following article has been written and contributed to PsypressUK by the Reverend Nemu, author of Nemu’s End: The History, Psychology, and Poetry of the Apocalypse and the Nemu's End blog, with …  […]

  8. June 18, 2014

    […] The following article has been written and contributed to PsypressUK by the Reverend Nemu, author of Nemu’s End: The History, Psychology, and Poetry of the Apocalypse and the Nemu's End blog, with …  […]

  9. June 20, 2014

    […] This article focuses on the legal history of Santo Daime (SD) though other lineages also have international profiles, the most widespread being the União de Vegetal (UDV). After bubbling and brewing away for millennia in the Amazon, ayahuasca began seeping out through the foliage at the turn of the 20th century. This powerful visionary tea was adopted by rubber tapper communities in what is now the Brazil-Bolivia-Peru borderland, and various sects emerged, including Santo Daime. A syncretic mix of Catholicism, Spiritualism, and indigenous shamanism, it spread to the rest of Brazil in the 80s, and today there are groups dotted around Latin American, Europe, and the US, as well as in Japan, India, Israel, and other places[i].  […]

  10. April 7, 2015

    […] Vers reel-9. eVa's lake-in-wood. Ayahuasca and the Vines of Politics « Psychedelic Press UK. […]

  11. March 3, 2017

    […] by the hundreds to South America to heal themselves with the help of a cocktail of sacred plants. Two religious groups in the US have been granted the right to use ayahuasca in their healing ceremonies. People are even […]

Leave a Reply

WordPress spam blocked by CleanTalk.
Visit Us On TwitterVisit Us On FacebookVisit Us On InstagramVisit Us On Youtube